AI isn’t taking over the world—it’s just changing how we live in it

Image supplied by: Cloey Aconley

Though Terminator (1982) fans might disagree, the robots aren’t out to get us.

From syllabi with threatening notes on breaches of academic integrity, to promises from experts that artificial intelligence (AI) is out to steal your jobs, AI has cultivated a culture of fear around its implementation. Yet, the same buzz existed at the invention of revolutionary technologies—the printing press, motion picture, and computer—all of which we consider essential today.

As someone who aspires to have a career in writing, I’m probably the last person who should be telling you to chill about the rise of AI. However, I simply don’t believe AI has the capacity to replicate human writing. If it can be recreated by a robot, it probably just means the work isn’t that good.

The rise of mechanically reproduced art, such as the mass distribution of prints and the development of the motion picture, warranted the same culture of fear surrounding it that we observe with AI today.

In 1935, German philosopher Walter Benjamin published The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, critiquing society for losing sight of the original “aura” of a work of art. He stated art will be greatly impacted by modern technology, accurately predicting how the very concept of what’s considered art will change.

Though Benjamin was right, the notion of art has also transformed for the better. What was once only accessible to upper-class of society has become a widespread tool for political liberation.

Art that used to be accessible only with money and influence is now performed at coffee shops and on street corners, spreading its message to anyone who will listen. Literacy rates have vastly increased since the early 20th century, and the dissemination of cultural commentary has never been wider.

In the 90s, when computers were becoming increasingly commonplace, there was a similar hysteria in the job market. Once barcodes replaced stamps, people asked what or even who would be replaced next.

The fact is, when computers start doing the jobs of people, the demand for people increases. Not just anyone, but highly-skilled labourers such as engineers and mechanics. These professionals drive advancements in skills and competencies, ultimately strengthening the workforce.

History is littered with technological innovation. We should focus on being on the right side of the curve instead of trying to stop it. Humans need to learn to embrace change—a natural byproduct of life.

Cloey is a third-year Politics, Philosophy, & Economics student and one of The Journal’s Assistant Arts & Culture Editors.

Tags

Technology

All final editorial decisions are made by the Editor(s) in Chief and/or the Managing Editor. Authors should not be ed, targeted, or harassed under any circumstances. If you have any grievances with this article, please direct your comments to [email protected].

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *